ELT News Think Tank
This Month's Think Tank Panel
|
Marc Helgesen
|
Peter Viney
|
Chuck Sandy
|
Panelists: Marc | Peter | Chuck
Date: December 2001
Topic: "What are some ways to increase language input inside
and outside the classroom?"
(The flip side to this article, where our authors and teachers discuss output, is January's article. -ed.)
Peter Viney
The first idea to discard is that there is 'good' input and 'bad' input.
Anything that makes students read, think about, consider, look at, sing
or do anything else with English input is 'good.' Years ago, I was a purist
about listening and when we were piloting our first video course, I did
so without letting students have transcripts. They begged for them and
so at last I handed them out after the class. The next day the transcripts
were covered with translations and highlighter. They'd gone home and interfaced
with the material for about an hour. Was it the most useful or most productive
use of an hour? I doubt it, but it was learner choice and all input is
good input. Since then, I've always included transcripts.
So where do you start? The Internet? CDs? Movies? Videos? Books? Imported
magazines? English language newspapers? Radio? Satellite or cable TV?
CNN News? All of them have a role. But while one student's Internet habit
might lead them into useful English language sites, another's love of
Steps or H'earsay could lead them to walking along singing along with
their Walkman. But some of us hate computers, others hate pop. A lot of
us probably hate Steps or H'earsay. So each solution will be an individual
one.
I think that graded readers, read at speed for entertainment are an important
common resource which is too often neglected with adults. There are hundreds
of graded readers, and I hate it when a class is issued one graded reader
'to study.' (Well, if it's one of my titles and a whole school system
adopts it as a set book, I don't hate it too much!) What you should do
if your school has a budget, is use a library system with lots of different
readers. My interest in graded reading schemes dates back to the late
1970's, when we organized a library system for our own students. We concentrated
on getting students to read for pleasure. Initially we used exercises
with readers, designed for gist rather than intensive work. Then we stopped
checking back. One of the most interesting results of our library was
that the less we checked on reading, the more books the students borrowed.
Eventually, we found that if a secretary issued books instead of the teacher,
the students borrowed more books again. Some of our students on intensive
courses were reading five or six graded readers a week. It would be nice
to produce graphs and charts showing the effect on their English, but
we didn't need to. We knew that reading - and reading strictly for pleasure
- had an effect on the student's performance in all the skills. The greatest
compliment the system had was when students told us they were beginning
to read more in their own language as well.
DVDs often have dual soundtracks and switchable subtitles, and students
should be encouraged to play around with them - if only the menus weren't
so cumbersome and adhered to a common pattern! With DVDs they can replay
a favourite piece of a movie or documentary, and switch back and forward
into English, with or without the subtitles. This is being done, but after
years of producing videos with guided activity books, I still believe
they're better off with a specially-written video with guided exercises,
and when we eventually move our ESL / ELT titles onto DVD, we probably
won't include a subtitle track.
Marc's innervoice technique is the most interesting contribution to this
month's debate. I've been interested in this on a less sophisticated level
(because I've been working with true beginners material not false beginners).
Good ideas don't need justification, but this one reminds me of the ideas
of Moshe Feldenkrais, the author of "Awareness through Movement".
Feldenkrais drew on a number of disciplines - martial arts, yoga and the
Alexander technique. As well as developing a system of exercise or movement,
Feldenkrais worked with severe injuries and handicaps. One example would
be a person whose right leg was paralysed, or very painful to move. The
person could do the movements with the left leg, then imagine or think
through the exercise with the immobile right leg. Feldenkrais believed
neural pathways were re-educated in the process. This backs up the point
that you needn't vocalise to gain benefit from an exercise, even a pronunciation
exercise. At a mundane level, it means that students can use a Workbook
in this way. They needn't write answers or fill in gaps, they can simply
think their way through exercises on the train or subway. It's almost
too obvious to state, but students need reminding that they can benefit
without making marks on paper.
Panelists: Marc | Peter | Chuck
Peter Viney, Freelance ELT Author
Co-author of New American Streamline & Grapevine. Peter's Web site
<<Back Number | Top |
Recent Issue>>
|