Interview
Liz & John Soars
Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3
On Teaching (cont'd)
Any classes in particular that stood out during your teaching years?
John: I remember the highest level class I have ever taught. There was a Russian girl in the class
who knew the English language better than me. I was terrified of her. She would challenge my
knowledge and ability within seconds of the beginning of the lesson. I had to reassure myself that
I was a native speaker and she wasn't, but I swear I taught her nothing in sixty hours of being
together. Of course, there are many classes that stand out, usually because one particular student
made it all come together.
Andrea, an Italian boy with a girl's name, who was so kind and funny
that everyone fell in love with him. Annick, a French lady who mothered the whole class, who told
me as she arrived ten minutes late 'Sorry I'm late, I should have gone to the post office.' (What
she meant was I had to go to the post office.) Fuji, a Japanese boy who studied at International
House, London, for over a year. He had every teacher at every level - he knew the school better
than anyone else. His hobby was collecting idioms, which he wrote down in a big A4 folder. His
English was very good, in fact, but he kept trying to use idioms that were inappropriate or
old-fashioned - "Today, John, is a lovely day, I am in the pink!"
Liz: In my first year at IH London, I was given a specially constructed 'problem' class of students
with 'attitude'. This was because an IH luminary was doing research into badly motivated students
and presenting a paper at the IATEFL conference on the subject. She observed the class daily.
Pressure! The inevitable happened, when you expect the worst it can only be better, and the students
turned out to be the most enjoyable, entertaining, volatile class ever. I loved them dearly.
Also,
a truly advanced, advanced class one hot July. There were some strong personalities and some warring
nationalities, but the peacemaking skills of the delightfully down-to-earth Sister Sofia, a nun from
Poland, meant that discussions/arguments always ended on a harmonious note. This class informed me
one day that they would all be absent the next day as they were camping out all night for tickets
for Wimbledon. And indeed next day the room was almost empty, just Sister Sofia and myself, so we
watched Wimbledon on TV, and there were the rest of the class, in the front row of Centre Court. We
weren't at all surprised.
Do you think qualifications such as the RSA and Trinity, adequately prepare a teacher to the
world of ELT?
John: Yes and no is the answer. Yes - because they give vital practical and theoretical guidance.
Considering the relatively short duration of the courses a great deal is accomplished. The teaching
practice is probably the best preparation. No - because a training course will never prepare you for
every teaching situation and the day-to-day reality of lesson preparation and five(?) hours
teaching. Inevitably, on courses, an unrealistic amount of time is spent planning individual
lessons. A false sense of what the nature of teaching can result.
Also as the years have passed the
content of courses has become ever fuller, as so many different approaches and ideas have hit the
profession. It becomes increasingly difficult to cover the syllabus and at the same time develop in
trainee teachers the ability to make informed judgements about it all. Sometimes they leave courses
feeling like experts because they have covered so much, when they still need above all the daily
grind of experience.
The use of the Internet and multimedia in the classroom and for private study is becoming
increasingly popular - to what extent do you think technology will play a role in ELT in the
near future?
Liz: Technology will undoubtedly play a bigger role in the future, near and distant. However, the
history of technological advances so far is peppered with predictions of teachers becoming
redundant as machines take over their jobs. This hasn't happened yet and we don't believe that it
ever will. The machine will only ever be another resource for teacher and learner. Interacting with
a machine, especially in language learning, can never replace the vitality and reality of classroom
interaction.
When you go to a self-access centre with computers and videos etc. they are largely
silent rooms, with electronic beeps being the predominant sound. This environment can have a certain
usefulness and enjoyment, especially for revision purposes or simply as a change from the classroom,
but languages are used to interact with people, so we feel that the teacher and the classroom will
never be replaced.
Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3
<<Back Number | Top |
Recent Issue>>
|