Old wine and new bottles
The issue of content-based instruction (CBI) for language instruction has been around
since the 1960s, though it didn't get much attention outside of elementary schools and
immersion programs prior to the mid 1980s. Pally's collection of original articles,
prepared by some of the best known names in CBI as well as some experienced ESLers
relatively unknown in CBI, covers a lot of ground. Sustained Content Teaching will
open eyes for both teachers currently engaged in CBI courses and newcomers to this
field. Not much here is theoretically "new," but it’s a nicely varied collection of
current classroom reports.
"Where's the Beef?"
I have argued elsewhere that one of the principal issues in CBI is the lack of a
shared definition, or boundaries. Within the covers of Pally’s book the contributors
all pretty much agree on a definition of sustained content: "classes in which students
practice English language skills… in the process of studying one subject area, usually
for a semester." Most of the contributors focus on academic skills more than language
per se, such as the so-called "critical thinking skills." As Pally describes, sustained
CBI courses simulate a college class but also provide explicit instruction in language
and academic skills, hence are not adjunct classes to "mainstream" courses. Clearly
this focus on EAP is a far more limited approach than is common in Asia, and a
significant distinction from the many writing support courses offered as adjuncts at
North American universities.
The roots of the fruit
Without writing an entire thesis on the precepts of CBI, a few concepts from within
the text are worthwhile here. Pally points out that, as observed by Widdowson,
authenticity in language misses the point without authenticity in context. The
sustained content course is sustained on one content area because most authentic
(short-term) topic areas courses bring in too little academic/professional language:
students need to develop procedural knowledge (how to find info). In Pally's model
sustained CBI is a type of EAP course where students have many more projects than most
traditional language learning courses, and thereby provides greater opportunities for
students helping students (scaffolding). However, there appears to be some evasion in
use of the term "sustained content," as when a cartoon book is used in one course
(Calvin and Hobbes, analyzing speech) and an assortment of films in another (analyzing
society through critical thinking). The distinction between (short-term) topic and
sustained content appears not to be that of all lessons under one "major," as these
are not traditionally defined "mainstream" courses but academic skills courses.
Nelson and Burns observe in Chapter 8, "content dictates the language items taught." Rather than students' majors dictating content, there are numerous cases displayed where the content was selected by ESL faculty in order to promote the learning of specific language/academic skills. Bailey’s and May-Landy's contributions are two of the few instances in ESL-based CBI where both content and (language) skills goals are identified clearly. It seems that CBI has tangled roots, no matter how nicely the above-ground branches are manicured.
Apples and Oranges
Pally observes that ESL teachers are not masters of content, but rather discourse
analysts, helping students "identify and use the assumptions, rhetorical conventions,
and argumentation of English." This appears to be the basis for the argument that
content may be generic: the "specific details of the discipline [major] are secondary."
Kasper, one of more published authors on CBI in tertiary settings, goes so far as to
allow students to identify their content in her internet research skills sustained CBI
course reported in this text. Camhi takes on another extreme when presenting grammar
as content. Bailey also notes that she integrates grammar instruction through the
course as mini-lessons: explicit grammar instruction is a concept many CBI advocates
would abhor.
Imported foods
The cases included in this text, while illustrative of various concepts of sustained CBI,
seem to have little orientation to the needs of EFL. Most reports come out of New York
City, with two cases from Georgia State University. Only one comes from an EFL land
and Flowerdew's report on academic English for engineering students in Hong Kong hardly
matches what most EFL teachers face. Many nice ideas are provided, but I’m not sure how
many could be adopted in foreign lands other than at English-medium international schools.
Last Rounds
I enjoyed Sustained Content Teaching because it offers lots of interesting ideas on a
subject area of great interest. The fact that each case study (each chapter) provided a
solid theoretical argument for its design, with extensive references, made these similar
to reader-friendly journal articles. I read this over a few weeks, with breaks for other
projects, and felt no discontinuity. Most chapters include appendices to help us see the
inside of the classroom and the teacher’s evaluative processes. It would not be difficult
to replicate many of these courses in our own schools, they are so clearly documented.
The book has a comprehensive index, which will be a useful resource in the future.